|
|
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| <div class="irlcontenttop"> | | <div class="irlcontenttop"> |
| <div class="irlsubtitle">A 1,689.4' long stringer bridge spanning SR510 over the Indian River in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida</div> | | <div class="irlsubtitle">A 1,689.4' long stringer bridge spanning SR510 over the Indian River in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida</div> |
| | | <div class="irlabout"> |
| <section begin=about /> | | <section begin=about /> |
| [[File:Wabasso_Bridge_002.jpg|320px|thumb|right|Wabasso Bridge, SR510, Indian River County|link= Wabasso Bridge]]
| | Wabasso Causeway Bridge is a 1,689.4' long, two-lane, concrete bridge spanning Bridge Blvd. (SR510) over the Indian River in Indian River County, Florida. The bridge's longest span is 112.9ft and it has a maximum vertical clearance of 62.3 feet. Wabasso Bridge was built by Scott Construction Company in 1970. The Florida Department of Transportation numbers are 880051 (relief bridge) and 880053 (main span). |
| The Wabasso Causeway Bridge is a two-lane concrete bridge spanning the Indian River (Intracoastal Waterway) in Indian River County, Florida. The two-lane bridge has a vertical clearance of 65 feet (20 m). The bridge was built by Scott Construction Company and was completed in 1970. The Florida Department of Transportation numbers are 880051 and 880053.
| |
| <section end=about /> | | <section end=about /> |
| | </div> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div class="irlcontentmiddle"> | | <div class="irlcontentmiddle"> |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| <div class="irlcontentmiddle"> | | <div class="irlcontentmiddle"> |
| ==History== | | ==History== |
| [[Image:Wabasso_Bridge_Old.jpg|320px|thumb|right|Old Wabasso Bridge, Vero, Indian River County]] | | [[Image:Wabasso_Bridge_Old.jpg|240px|thumb|right|Old Wabasso Bridge, Vero, Indian River County]] |
| Until 1920, there were only two bridges spanning across the Indian River, one in Brevard County's Cocoa and the second in Martin County's Hobe Sound. On Labor Day in 1920, a new wooden Vero Bridge opened and access to the ocean was available to all who lived on the Vero mainland. For boat traffic, a bridge tender, who lived in a house near the middle of the crossing, would open the metal swing span by hand. Tolls were charged to cross the bridge, ranging from 5 cents for pedestrians, 10 cents for horses and 35 cents for delivery trucks.<ref name=tcpalm /> | | Until 1920, there were only two bridges spanning across the Indian River, one in Brevard County's Cocoa and the second in Martin County's Hobe Sound. On Labor Day in 1920, a new wooden Vero Bridge opened and access to the ocean was available to all who lived on the Vero mainland. For boat traffic, a bridge tender, who lived in a house near the middle of the crossing, would open the metal swing span by hand. Tolls were charged to cross the bridge, ranging from 5 cents for pedestrians, 10 cents for horses and 35 cents for delivery trucks.<ref name=tcpalm /> |
| </div> | | </div> |
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| <div class="irlvideo"> | | <div class="irlvideo"> |
| ==Video== | | ==Video== |
| {{#evu:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKdUU-OjVck|dimensions=420|alignment=left}} | | {{#evu:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKdUU-OjVck|dimensions=inherit|alignment=left}} |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </div>
| |
| <div class="irlcontentmiddle">
| |
| ==Fact Sheet==
| |
| <p>Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.</p>
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="wikitable" style="clear:both;margin:10px 0 0 0;">
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Name:</td><td>CR-510 WABASSO RD over CANAL</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Structure number:</td><td>880047</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Location:</td><td>3MI W OF CR-615</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Purpose:</td><td>Carries highway over waterway</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Route classification:</td><td>Other Principal Arterial (Urban) <var>[14]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Length of largest span:</td><td>15.1 ft. <var>[4.6 m]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Total length:</td><td>60.0 ft. <var>[18.3 m]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Roadway width between curbs:</td><td>40.0 ft. <var>[12.2 m]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Deck width edge-to-edge:</td><td>42.0 ft. <var>[12.8 m]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Owner:</td><td>County Highway Agency <var>[02]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Year built:</td><td>1951</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Year reconstructed:</td><td>1968</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Historic significance:</td><td>Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places <var>[5]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Design load:</td><td>MS 13.5 / HS 15 <var>[3]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Number of main spans:</td><td>4</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Main spans material:</td><td>Concrete <var>[1]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Main spans design:</td><td>Slab <var>[01]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Deck type:</td><td>Concrete Cast-in-Place <var>[1]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Wearing surface:</td><td>Bituminous <var>[6]</var></td></tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| ==Inspection Report==
| |
| <p>Latest Available Inspection: October 2017</p>
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="wikitable">
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Good/Fair/Poor Condition:</td><td>Fair</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Status:</td><td>Open, no restriction <var>[A]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Average daily traffic:</td><td>5,500 <var>[as of 2017]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Truck traffic:</td><td>8% of total traffic</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Deck condition:</td><td>Good <var>[7 out of 9]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Superstructure condition:</td><td>Good <var>[7 out of 9]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Substructure condition:</td><td>Satisfactory <var>[6 out of 9]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Structural appraisal:</td><td>Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is <var>[5]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Deck geometry appraisal:</td><td>Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is <var>[5]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Water adequacy appraisal:</td><td>Better than present minimum criteria <var>[7]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Roadway alignment appraisal:</td><td>Equal to present minimum criteria <var>[6]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Channel protection:</td><td>Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. <var>[6]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Scour condition:</td><td>Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. <var>[8]</var></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="a">Sufficiency rating:</td><td>81.9</td></tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| ==InspectionHistory==
| |
| <table width="100%" class="wikitable" cellspacing="0"><tr><th>Date</th><th>Condition</th><th>Deck</th><th>Superstructure</th><th>Substructure</th><th>ADT</th><th>Suff. Rating</th></tr><tr><td>October 2017</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">81.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>October 2015</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">81.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>October 2013</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">81.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>October 2011</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">81.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>October 2009</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">81.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>November 2007</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">81.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>November 2005</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">80.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>November 2003</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">80.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>February 2002</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5500</td><td class="num">80.9</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>February 2000</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5100</td><td class="num">81.0</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>February 1998</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5100</td><td class="num">80.1</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>February 1996</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5100</td><td class="num">81.0</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>January 1994</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>5100</td><td class="num">82.0</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td>January 1992</td><td>Fair</td><td>Good</td><td>Good</td><td>Satisfactory</td><td>3000</td><td class="num">84.4</td></tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| ==Element Data==
| |
| <p>Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.</p>
| |
| <table width="100%" class="wikitable" cellspacing="0"><tr><th>Element</th><th>Units</th><th>Quantity</th><th>1-Good</th><th>2-Fair</th><th>3-Poor</th><th>4-Serious</th></tr><tr><td colspan="7" class="eltsubhead">Substructure</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev1"><span title="Element #215">Reinforced Concrete Abutment</span></td><td>linear ft.</td><td class="num">92</td><td class="num"><span title="100.0%">92</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev1"><span title="Element #226">Prestressed Concrete Pile</span></td><td>each</td><td class="num">12</td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="100.0%">12</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev1"><span title="Element #227">Reinforced Concrete Pile</span></td><td>each</td><td class="num">12</td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="66.7%">8</span></td><td class="num"><span title="33.3%">4</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev1"><span title="Element #234">Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap</span></td><td>linear ft.</td><td class="num">128</td><td class="num"><span title="100.0%">128</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td colspan="7" class="eltsubhead">Bridge Rail</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev1"><span title="Element #331">Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail</span></td><td>linear ft.</td><td class="num">121</td><td class="num"><span title="99.2%">120</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.8%">1</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td colspan="7" class="eltsubhead">Deck</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev1"><span title="Element #38">Reinforced Concrete Slab</span></td><td>sq. ft.</td><td class="num">2,520</td><td class="num"><span title="100.0%">2,520</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="lev2"><span title="Element #510">Wearing Surfaces</span></td><td>sq. ft.</td><td class="num">2,400</td><td class="num"><span title="99.1%">2,379</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.7%">16</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.2%">5</span></td><td class="num"><span title="0.0%">0</span></td></tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div class="irlcontentbottom"> | | <div class="irlcontentbottom"> |