Page values for "IRLNews:2021-03-01/NASA Causeway Bridges and Beyond"

From Indian River Lagoon Project

"News_Link" values

1 row is stored for this page
Title   NASA Causeway Bridges and Beyond
Url   https://indianriverlagoonnews.org/guide/index.php/IRLNews:2021-03-01/NASA_Causeway_Bridges_and_Beyond
Description   NASA passes ownership of the SR405 Indian River Causeway to the Florida Department of Transportation along with a decades old categorical exclusion that exempts the bridge replacement from environmental review.
Image   
Nasa Causeway Bridge SR405 2021 01.jpg
Region   Brevard County
Water_Body   Estuary
Location   Titusville
Access_Date   March 1, 2021
Published_Date   March 1, 2021
Publisher   Indian River Lagoon News
Type   Opinion-Editorial
Author_Last   IRLNews
Topic   Brevard County Locale
Text_Body   

The 1960's NASA causeways across the Indian and Banana River lagoons were constructed during a furious Cold War space race that completely disregarded the environment in the name of national security.

It wasn’t until 1970 that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was passed to regulate the environmental impact of Federal Agencies. NEPA requires federal organizations to adhere to a defined environmental review of their activities.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000000-QINU`"'?

There are 4 levels to a NEPA review, the first is Categorical Exclusion (CATEX), which allows a federal agency to list any activities that should be excluded from environmental review.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000001-QINU`"'? NASA has Categorically Excluded many activities and assets in the name of national security.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU`"'?

SR405 Indian River Bridge Rebuild

SR405

NASA is the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary's largest shareholder, and their mission statement includes promises of environmental stewardship, yet they continue to perpetuate outdated causeways that have constricted water flow in the Indian River and Banana River lagoon for decades.

NASA's project to rebuild the 1964 Indian River Bridge avoided a NEPA environmental review when NASA Categorically Excluded the project, and then named the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) as a co-agency on the project. As a federal co-agency the FHWA inherited the bridge project’s Categorical Exclusions from NASA.

In 2017, NASA signed over ownership of the SR405 Indian River Causeway to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000003-QINU`"'? . A convenient 2016 FHWA - FDOT Agreement allowed FHWA to easily transfer the rebuild project's Categorical Exclusions to FDOT.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000004-QINU`"'?

And so, FDOT now owns the SR405 Indian River Causeway, and the state's rebuild project is exempt from environmental review. (Recanted on 5/27/2021)

(05/27/2021 Edit)

Timeline

  • 2015 NASA-KSC begins planning SR405 Indian River Causeway rebuild project.
  • 2016 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) signs a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) giving Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) the ability to perform NEPA environmental assessments on FHWA projects in Florida.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000005-QINU`"'?
  • 2016 NASA names FHWA as a federal co-agency on the project.
  • 2017 NASA GSA Targeted Asset Review recommends passing SR405 Indian River Causeway ownership to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000006-QINU`"'? The bridge now falls under NASA's list of categorical exclusions as a targeted real property asset.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000007-QINU`"'?
  • 2018 FDOT and USCG serve public notice and hold public hearings presenting the Project's Development and Environmental (PD&E) Study, and completed construction plans.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000008-QINU`"'?
  • 2020 FDOT Office of Environmental Management gives the project a NEPA Type 2 Categorical Exclusion.
  • 2021 FDOT owns NASA's SR405 Indian River Causeway, has categorically excluded the project from an environmental impact study (EIS), and plans to begin construction in the fall of 2021.

(End Edit)

A 57 year old earthen berm causeway; hurriedly constructed during the Cold War; built years before environmental regulations were enacted; will continue to constrict over 80% of the Indian River lagoon at Addison Point.?'"`UNIQ--ref-00000009-QINU`"'?

Unfortunately, the Indian River Bridge project's lack of a thorough environmental impact study is just an indication of what is ahead for the national estuary as environmental stewardship transitions from KSC Environmental Branch professionals to state run agencies.

And Beyond

KSC Property Suitability

NASA is quickly working to divest it’s non-mission critical facilities and vacant land at Kennedy Space Center (KSC).

The 2017 KSC Master Plan displays a map showing over 8,000 acres of "developable" property available for commercial development, including areas deep in the heart of a National Wildlife Refuge and a National Seashore.?'"`UNIQ--ref-0000000A-QINU`"'?

Kennedy Space Center is the reason these wilderness areas exist in the first place. KSC set aside a large land parcel as a buffer zone, and they gave it to the to the National Park Service (NPS), and Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), to manage as Canaveral National Seashore (CANA) and Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (MINWR).

Now, NASA is offering up the land it set aside as public wilderness areas for commercial development. Fish and Wildlife Service: Proposed Shiloh Launch Complex in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge

For decades, we have trusted NASA to be good environmental stewards for the largest stretch of undeveloped land on Florida’s East Coast, yet it appears that the MINWR and CANA wilderness areas are in grave jeopardy.?'"`UNIQ--ref-0000000B-QINU`"'?

We stand to lose a National Wildlife Refuge, a National Seashore, and numerous archeological sites if NASA's plans for Kennedy Space Center are successful.


A National Space Center Becomes A State Run Space Port

The 2017 KSC Master Plan outlines NASA’s intention to transition day to day operation of the launch center to Space Florida, in what is to become Cape Canaveral Spaceport.

Cape Canaveral Spaceport's 2017 Master Plan?'"`UNIQ--ref-0000000C-QINU`"'? makes no mention of the environment; their mission is to provide public launch facilities for the commercial space industry's tourists and freight.

In the future, Space Florida's spaceport, and it’s many commercial tenants, will be individually responsible for their parcel of Kennedy Space Center's environment.


  • Should a 2021 state run commercial spaceport inherit the same environmental exclusions that NASA's KSC received during the 1960's Cold War?


  • Should our National wilderness areas be parceled out for commercial space development?


  • Can commercial space organizations be good environmental stewards for our National Wildlife Refuge, National Seashore, and the lagoons of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary?


To be continued...

See Also

Web Links

Documents


References

?'"`UNIQ--references-0000000D-QINU`"'?

Poster   Admin
Posted   20210228165959