Drilldown: bridge data

12217 (1) · 12218 (1)

MM (1)

03-03 (1)

Brevard (1)

Viera (1)

00009 (1)

None (1)

Brushy Canal (1) · Palm Canal (1)

None (1)

I-95 (1)

700163 (1) · 700164 (1)

1.2 Mi S of Wickham R. (1) · 1.5 MI S of Wickham Rd (1)

28123269 (1) · 28124426 (1)

80424447 (1) · 80424785 (1)

FDOT (1)

1965 (1)

6 (1)

68000 (1)

2016 (1)

Highway (1)

Waterway (1)

Concrete (1)

Culvert (1)

10 · 59 · 52 · 53 · 536 · 54 · 55 · 56 · 563 · 57 · 579 · 58 · 587 · 596 · 516 · 6 · 60 · 602 · 61 · 610

Other values:

Search

0 (1)

N/A (1)

N/A (1)

N/A (1)

Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1)

Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. (1)

01-17 (1)

2 - way (1) · 2 way (1)

1980 (1)

N/A (1)

Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required to protect exposed foundations · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing by assessment, by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing by assessment, by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. · Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. · Bridge not over waterway. · Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. · Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event. Instructions contained in a plan of action have been implemented to reduce the risk to users from a bridge failure during or immediately after a flood event. · Other · None

117980 (1)

2038 (1)

None (1)