Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
700034 (1) ·
700117 (1) ·
700119 (1) ·
700126 (1) ·
700127 (1) ·
700176 (1) ·
790082 (1) ·
790093 (1) ·
790124 (1) ·
930004 (1) ·
930026 (1) ·
934914 (1)
'0.3MI E OF US-1 ' (1) ·
'0.8Mi N OF BOYNTON BCH B ' (1) ·
'1 Mile South of SR-786 ' (1) ·
'2.3 MI E of US-17 ' (1) ·
'I-95 NB - SR-520 ' (1) ·
'I-95 NB - Tillman Canal ' (1) ·
'I-95 SB over US-1 ' (1) ·
'I-95 SB- Tillman Canal ' (1) ·
'SR-401 NB - Barge Canal ' (1) ·
'SR-415 - St. Johns River ' (1) ·
'SR-519 NB I-95 ' (1) ·
'SR-519 SB I-95 ' (1)
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) ·
N/A (1)
Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. (1) ·
N/A (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. (1) ·
Bridge not over waterway. (1)
Showing below up to 12 results in range #1 to #12.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)