Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
'Banana River Relief East' (1) ·
'City St. & Crane Creek ' (1) ·
'CR-515 & Indian River ' (1) ·
'FECRR ' (1) ·
'GARDEN CANAL ' (1) ·
'Halifax River ' (1) ·
'HILLSBORO L-14 CANAL ' (1) ·
'I 95 and SR 704 ' (1) ·
'Indian River ' (1) ·
'SR-513 ' (1) ·
'St. Lucie Canal ' (1) ·
'Tide Relief Canal ' (1) ·
'Turkey Creek ' (1)
700006 (1) ·
700012 (1) ·
700015 (1) ·
700082 (1) ·
700083 (1) ·
700137 (1) ·
700148 (1) ·
700203 (1) ·
700221 (1) ·
790147 (1) ·
880051 (1) ·
890132 (1) ·
890133 (1) ·
930361 (1) ·
930469 (1) ·
934519 (1) ·
935206 (1)
'0.1MI E of SW 9TH AVE ' (1) ·
'0.7Mi East of US-1 ' (1) ·
'1mi N of SR-76(Kanner Hw)' (1) ·
'A1A on Singer Island ' (1) ·
'A1A-Port Orange Relief ' (1) ·
'ADJ. TO N. SIDE OF SR-880' (1) ·
'I-95 SR 704 interchange ' (1) ·
'SR 520 EB - Indian River ' (1) ·
'SR-404 EB-Banana River ' (1) ·
'SR-404 WB - SR-513 ' (1) ·
'SR-404 WB-Banana River ' (1) ·
'SR-528 EB - Indian River ' (1) ·
'SR-528 WB - CR-515 ' (1) ·
'US-1 - Crane Cr & City St' (1) ·
'US-1 - FECRR ' (1) ·
'US-1 over Turkey Creek ' (1)
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) ·
N/A (1) ·
No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge not over waterway. (1) ·
Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event. Instructions contained in a plan of action have been implemented to reduce the risk to users from a bridge failure during or immediately after a flood event. (1)
Showing below up to 17 results in range #1 to #17.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)