Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
'Bear Wildlife Crossing ' (1) ·
'Canal ' (1) ·
'Crane Creek ' (1) ·
'Eau Gallie River ' (1) ·
'Hanson Grant Outlet ' (1) ·
'I-4 ' (1) ·
'I-95 ' (1) ·
'Little Haw Swamp ' (1) ·
'RELIEF CANAL ' (1) ·
'Rio Mar Bay ' (1) ·
'Rockledge Creek ' (1) ·
'Spruce Creek ' (1) ·
'SR-713 (King Hwy) ' (1) ·
'Underhill Slough ' (1)
'Bay Drive ' (1) ·
'CR-4009 ' (1) ·
'Croton Road ' (1) ·
'Dubber Road ' (1) ·
'Enterprise Rd. ' (1) ·
'I-95 (SR-9) ' (1) ·
'Lake Harney Road ' (1) ·
'LARCH AVE ' (1) ·
'NB SR-9 (I-95) ' (1) ·
'Pinehurst Ave N ' (1) ·
'River Drive ' (1) ·
'SR 400 WB ' (1) ·
'Truck Trail #12 ' (1) ·
'Tucker Lane ' (1) ·
'Viera Blvd EB ' (1) ·
'Viera Blvd WB ' (1)
704045 (1) ·
704093 (1) ·
704094 (1) ·
704097 (1) ·
704098 (1) ·
704176 (1) ·
705601 (1) ·
790191 (1) ·
790247 (1) ·
790800 (1) ·
794050 (1) ·
794193 (1) ·
885811 (1) ·
885812 (1) ·
890139 (1) ·
937007 (1) ·
940163 (1)
'0.1 Mile West of A1A ' (1) ·
'0.1MI W OF MILITARY TRAIL' (1) ·
'0.2 Mile S of Aurora Road' (1) ·
'0.9 mi N of Wickham Rd ' (1) ·
'1 Mi So. of SR-421 ' (1) ·
'1.2 miles South of SR-520' (1) ·
'1.5mi N of SR-68 ' (1) ·
'100 ft West of Ruffner Rd' (1) ·
'100Ft. South of Bay Drive' (1) ·
'2.5 Miles South of SR-520' (1) ·
'4 Mi South of Maytown Rd.' (1) ·
'Enterprise Rd. Over I-4 ' (1) ·
'I-4 WB over Bear Crossing' (1) ·
'I-95 (2 mi. N. of SR-76) ' (1) ·
'Lake George Conservation ' (1) ·
'Viera Blvd EB over I-95 ' (1) ·
'Viera Blvd WB over I-95 ' (1)
Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. (1) ·
Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and brush restrict the channel. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) ·
N/A (1)
Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. (1) ·
Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. (1) ·
Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting (1) ·
N/A (1) ·
Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge not over waterway. (1) ·
Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1)
Showing below up to 17 results in range #1 to #17.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)