Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
790800 (1) ·
790801 (1) ·
794050 (1) ·
884038 (1) ·
884047 (1) ·
930072 (1) ·
930805 (1) ·
930806 (1) ·
930807 (1) ·
930808 (1) ·
930809 (1) ·
930811 (1) ·
934126 (1) ·
935508 (1)
'.2MI E OF HOMEWOOD ROAD ' (1) ·
'0.5MI N OF JUPITER BCH RD' (1) ·
'1.0 Mi South of CR-827 ' (1) ·
'1.9 MI WEST OF SR-715 ' (1) ·
'13.5 Mi S/O S/B E of US27' (1) ·
'2.3mi N on Indian Lake Rd' (1) ·
'21.0 Mi North of US-27 ' (1) ·
'300FT East of CR-717 ' (1) ·
'33FT E OF CR-611 43RD AVE' (1) ·
'4 Mi South of Maytown Rd.' (1) ·
'4.0 MI NW OF US-441 ' (1) ·
'6.3MI S of SoBay at US-27' (1) ·
'AT CR-615 (66TH AVE.) ' (1) ·
'Lake George Conservation ' (1)
Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. (1) ·
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1)
Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. (1) ·
N/A (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1)
Showing below up to 14 results in range #1 to #14.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)