Drilldown: bridge data

From Indian River Lagoon Project
bridge data > Lanes 028a: Other & Superstructure 059: N/A & Culvert 062: Other

Use the filters below to narrow your results.

ObjectID:
Status:
AM (1) · MM (1) · ST (1)
Date:
03-03 (1) · 04-03 (1) · 04-19 (1) · 05-03 (1) · 06-03 (1) · 12-02 (1)
County 003:
Brevard (1) · Indian River (1) · Martin (1) · Palm Beach (1) · Saint Lucie (1) · Volusia (1)
Place 004:
None (1) · 24350 (1) · 30975 (1) · 35550 (1) · 45775 (1) · 54175 (1) · 58725 (1) · 63362 (1) · 77275 (1) · Boynton Beach (1) · Cape Canaveral (1) · Cocoa (1) · Daytona Beach (1) · DeBary (1) · DeLand (1) · Fort Pierce (1) · Haverhill (1) · Holly Hill (1) · Lake Park (1) · Malabar (1) · Melbourne (1) · Micco (1) · New Smyrna Beach (1) · Ormond Beach (1) · Palm Bay (1) · Palm Beach Gardens (1) · Palm Shores (1) · Port Orange (1) · Port St. John (1) · Riviera Beach (1) · Rockledge (1) · South Daytona (1) · Stuart (1) · Titusville (1) · Valkaria (1) · Vero Beach (1) · Viera (1) · West Palm Beach (1)
Route 005d:
Direction 005e:
None (1) · East (1) · South (1) · West (1)
Features 006a:
Critical 006b:
None (1)
Facility 007:
Number 008:
Location 009:
Latitude 016:
Longitude 017:
Owner 022:
31 (1) · City (1) · County (1) · FDOT (1) · Town (1)
Built 027:
Lanes 028a: (Click arrow to add another value)
Traffic 029:
Traffic Year 030:
2010 (1) · 2012 (1) · 2013 (1) · 2014 (1) · 2015 (1) · 2016 (1) · 2017 (1) · 2018 (1)
Service On 042a:
Highway (1) · Highway - Pedestrian (1)
Service Under 042b:
Highway - Waterway (1) · Other (1) · Waterway (1) · Waterway Relief (1)
Kind 043a:
Aluminum - Iron (1) · Concrete (1) · Prestressed concrete (1) · Steel (1)
Type 043b:
Culvert (1)
Length 049:
10 (1) · 11 (1) · 12 (1) · 13 (1) · 14 (1) · 16 (1) · 17 (1) · 18 (1) · 21 (1) · 23 (1) · 28 (1) · 33 (1) · 6 (1) · 7 (1) · 8 (1) · 9 (1)
Width 052:
0 (1) · 11 (1) · 16 (1) · 7 (1)
Deck 058:
N/A (1)
Superstructure 059: (Click arrow to add another value)
Substructure 060:
N/A (1)
Channel 061:
Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. (1) · Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) · Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and brush restrict the channel. (1) · Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) · Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) · N/A (1) · No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. (1)
Culvert 062: (Click arrow to add another value)
Inspect Date 090:
01-16 (1) · 01-17 (1) · 01-18 (1) · 02-16 (1) · 02-17 (1) · 02-18 (1) · 03-16 (1) · 03-17 (1) · 04-16 (1) · 04-17 (1) · 05-16 (1) · 05-17 (1) · 06-16 (1) · 06-17 (1) · 07-16 (1) · 07-17 (1) · 08-16 (1) · 08-17 (1) · 09-16 (1) · 09-17 (1) · 10-16 (1) · 10-17 (1) · 11-16 (1) · 11-17 (1) · 12-16 (1) · 12-17 (1)
Direction 102:
1 - way (1) · 2 - way (1) · 2 way (1) · One lane bridge for 2 way traffic (1)
Rebuilt 106:
None (1) · 1969 (1) · 1970 (1) · 1974 (1) · 1978 (1) · 1980 (1) · 1981 (1) · 1986 (1) · 1987 (1) · 1989 (1) · 1991 (1) · 1994 (1) · 1995 (1) · 1997 (1) · 1999 (1) · 2001 (1) · 2003 (1) · 2004 (1) · 2005 (1) · 2007 (1) · 2008 (1) · 2010 (1) · 2012 (1) · 2013 (1) · 2014 (1)
Deck Type 107:
9 (1) · Concrete Cast-in-Place (1) · N/A (1)
Scour 113:
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing by assessment, by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing by assessment, by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. (1) · Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. (1) · Bridge not over waterway. (1)
Future 114:
Future Year 115:
2032 (1) · 2033 (1) · 2034 (1) · 2035 (1) · 2036 (1) · 2037 (1) · 2038 (1) · 2039 (1) · 2040 (1)
Clearance 116:
None (1)

Showing below up to 190 results in range #1 to #190.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

T


View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://indianriverlagoonnews.org/guide/index.php/Special:Drilldown/bridge_data"