Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
'BESSEY CREEK ' (1) ·
'CORAL GARDENS OUTFALL ' (1) ·
'COUNTY LINE CANAL C-23 ' (1) ·
'Danforth Creek ' (1) ·
'S Fork St. Lucie River ' (1) ·
'SR 91 TPK (STUART INT) ' (1) ·
'SR-518 ' (1) ·
'SR-91 (Fl. Tpk.) ' (1) ·
'SR-91 (Fla's. Turnpike) ' (1) ·
'SR-91 (Fla's.Turnpike) ' (1) ·
'ST LUCIE CANAL ' (1) ·
'US-192 ' (1)
'EB Martin Downs Bd' (1) ·
'EB SR - 714 ' (1) ·
'HURON WAY ' (1) ·
'I-95 ' (1) ·
'I-95 NB ' (1) ·
'I-95 SB ' (1) ·
'NB I-95 (SR-9) ' (1) ·
'NORFOLK BLVD. ' (1) ·
'SB I-95 (SR-9 ) ' (1) ·
'SR 91 TPK SB 131.0' (1) ·
'SR-714 ' (1) ·
'SR-91 TPK NB 131.0' (1) ·
'SR91 N/S TPK 135.6' (1) ·
'SR91 N/S TPK 138.1' (1) ·
'SR91 SB TPK 134.32' (1) ·
'WB Martin Downs Bd' (1) ·
'WB SR - 714 ' (1)
700122 (1) ·
700209 (1) ·
700941 (1) ·
890038 (1) ·
890066 (1) ·
890068 (1) ·
890083 (1) ·
890085 (1) ·
890121 (1) ·
890122 (1) ·
890134 (1) ·
890135 (1) ·
890143 (1) ·
890159 (1) ·
891000 (1) ·
894047 (1) ·
894048 (1)
'0.1Mi E of ONTARIO DRIVE ' (1) ·
'0.1MI. E of KANNER HWY ' (1) ·
'1.3 MI N OF STUART INTRCH' (1) ·
'1.5 Mi N/O SW Kanner Hwy ' (1) ·
'1.5 N of SW KANNER HWY ' (1) ·
'2.5 mi East of TPK Exit ' (1) ·
'3.4MI NORTH OF SR-714 ' (1) ·
'3.7 MI S. OF STUART INT. ' (1) ·
'3.7MI S/O STUART INT. ' (1) ·
'I-95 NB SR-518 ' (1) ·
'I-95 over US-192 ' (1) ·
'I-95 SB SR-518 ' (1) ·
'SR-714 East of Fla. Tpk. ' (1) ·
'SR-714 East of Fla. Tpke.' (1) ·
'STUART TPK INTERCHANGE ' (1) ·
'Turnpike at Stuart exit. ' (1)
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) ·
N/A (1) ·
No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge not over waterway. (1)
Showing below up to 17 results in range #1 to #17.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)