Drilldown: bridge data

From Indian River Lagoon Project
bridge data > Owner 022: Other & Culvert 062 : N/A or No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift.

Use the filters below to narrow your results.

ObjectID:
 
Status:
Place 004:
Route 005d:
Direction 005e:
Features 006a:
 
Critical 006b:
Facility 007:
 
Number 008:
 
Location 009:
 
Latitude 016:
 
Longitude 017:
 
Owner 022: (Click arrow to add another value)
Built 027:
Lanes 028a:
1 (1) · 10 (1) · 11 (1) · 12 (1) · 13 (1) · 2 (1) · 3 (1) · 4 (1) · 5 (1) · 6 (1) · 7 (1) · 8 (1) · 9 (1)
Traffic 029:
 
Traffic Year 030:
Length 049:
Width 052:
Culvert 062: (Click arrow to add another value)
Rebuilt 106:
Scour 113:
Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required to protect exposed foundations (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. (1) · Bridge not over waterway. (1) · Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1) · Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event. Instructions contained in a plan of action have been implemented to reduce the risk to users from a bridge failure during or immediately after a flood event. (1)
Future 114:
 
Future Year 115:
Clearance 116:

Showing below up to 250 results in range #1 to #250.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

T


View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)