Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
700023 (1) ·
700027 (1) ·
700080 (1) ·
700082 (1) ·
700114 (1) ·
700146 (1) ·
700148 (1) ·
700172 (1) ·
700192 (1) ·
700205 (1) ·
700208 (1) ·
700213 (1) ·
700233 (1)
'0.2 Miles East of US-1 ' (1) ·
'2.85 Miles East of SR-3 ' (1) ·
'SR-404 EB-Banana Riv Rel ' (1) ·
'SR-404 EB-Banana River ' (1) ·
'SR-404 WB-Banana River ' (1) ·
'SR-520 - Banana River ' (1) ·
'US 192 WB over Indian Riv' (1) ·
'US-1 NB over Goat Creek ' (1) ·
'US-192 WB-St Johns Relief' (1) ·
SR-520 - Banana River (1) ·
US-192 EB-St Johns Relief (1)
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1)
N/A (1) ·
Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event. Instructions contained in a plan of action have been implemented to reduce the risk to users from a bridge failure during or immediately after a flood event. (1)
Showing below up to 13 results in range #1 to #13.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)