Drilldown: bridge data

From Indian River Lagoon Project
bridge data > County 003 : Other or None & Inspect Date 090: 12-17

Use the filters below to narrow your results.

ObjectID:
Status:
AM (1) · MM (1) · ST (1)
Date:
03-03 (1) · 04-03 (1) · 04-19 (1) · 05-03 (1) · 06-03 (1) · 12-02 (1)
County 003: (Click arrow to add another value)
Place 004:
None (1) · 24350 (1) · 30975 (1) · 35550 (1) · 45775 (1) · 54175 (1) · 58625 (1) · 58725 (1) · 74625 (1) · 77275 (1) · Cocoa (1) · Daytona Beach (1) · Fort Pierce (1) · Grant (1) · Holly Hill (1) · Indiantown village (1) · Jupiter (1) · Jupiter Island (1) · Melbourne (1) · Merritt Island (1) · Micco (1) · Ormond Beach (1) · Palm Bay (1) · Palm Beach Gardens (1) · Port Orange (1) · Riviera Beach (1) · South Daytona (1) · Stuart (1) · Titusville (1) · Vero Beach (1) · Wellington village (1) · West Palm Beach (1)
Route 005d:
00000 (1) · 00001 (1) · 00009 (1) · 00040 (1) · 00050 (1) · 0005A (1) · 00091 (1) · 00095 (1) · 00098 (1) · 00405 (1) · 00500 (1) · 00510 (1) · 00520 (1) · 00603 (1) · 00606 (1) · 00613 (1) · 00630 (1) · 00707 (1) · 00708 (1) · 00710 (1) · 00712 (1) · 00714 (1) · 00722 (1) · 00723 (1) · 00726 (1) · 00732 (1) · 00A1A (1)
Direction 005e:
None (1) · North (1)
Features 006a:
Critical 006b:
None (1)
Facility 007:
Number 008:
Location 009:
Latitude 016:
Longitude 017:
Owner 022:
31 (1) · City (1) · County (1) · FDOT (1)
Built 027:
Lanes 028a:
1 (1) · 2 (1) · 3 (1) · 4 (1) · 5 (1) · 6 (1) · 7 (1)
Traffic 029:
Traffic Year 030:
2008 (1) · 2010 (1) · 2012 (1) · 2013 (1) · 2014 (1) · 2015 (1) · 2016 (1) · 2017 (1)
Service On 042a:
3rd Level Overpass (1) · Highway (1) · Highway - Pedestrian (1) · Overpass (1)
Service Under 042b:
Highway (1) · Highway - Waterway (1) · Highway-railroad (1) · Highway-waterway-railroad (1) · Railroad (1) · Waterway (1) · Waterway Relief (1)
Kind 043a:
Aluminum - Iron (1) · Concrete (1) · Concrete continuous (1) · Prestressed concrete (1) · Prestressed concrete continuous (1) · Steel (1) · Steel continuous (1)
Type 043b:
Culvert (1) · Segmental box girder (1) · Slab (1) · Stringer/Multi-beam/Girder (1)
Length 049:
Width 052:
0 (1) · 10 (1) · 11 (1) · 12 (1) · 13 (1) · 14 (1) · 15 (1) · 16 (1) · 17 (1) · 18 (1) · 20 (1) · 21 (1) · 22 (1) · 27 (1) · 28 (1) · 29 (1) · 31 (1) · 33 (1) · 36 (1) · 37 (1) · 39 (1) · 5 (1) · 6 (1) · 7 (1) · 8 (1) · 9 (1)
Deck 058:
Excellent (1) · Fair (1) · Good (1) · N/A (1) · Satisfactory (1) · Very Good (1)
Superstructure 059:
Excellent (1) · Fair (1) · Good (1) · N/A (1) · Satisfactory (1) · Very Good (1)
Substructure 060:
Excellent (1) · Fair (1) · Good (1) · N/A (1) · Satisfactory (1) · Very Good (1)
Channel 061:
Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. (1) · Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) · Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and brush restrict the channel. (1) · Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) · Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) · N/A (1) · No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. (1)
Culvert 062:
Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. (1) · Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. (1) · Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting (1) · N/A (1) · No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. (1) · Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. (1)
Inspect Date 090: (Click arrow to add another value)
Direction 102:
1 - way (1) · 2 - way (1) · 2 way (1) · One lane bridge for 2 way traffic (1)
Rebuilt 106:
None (1) · 1970 (1) · 1985 (1) · 1986 (1) · 1987 (1) · 1989 (1) · 1990 (1) · 1991 (1) · 1992 (1) · 1994 (1) · 2007 (1) · 2014 (1) · 2015 (1) · 2017 (1)
Deck Type 107:
9 (1) · Concrete Cast-in-Place (1) · Concrete Precast Panels (1) · N/A (1)
Scour 113:
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge not over waterway. (1) · Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1)
Future 114:
Future Year 115:
2032 (1) · 2033 (1) · 2034 (1) · 2035 (1) · 2036 (1) · 2037 (1) · 2038 (1) · 2039 (1)
Clearance 116:
None (1)

Showing below up to 145 results in range #1 to #145.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

T


View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://indianriverlagoonnews.org/guide/index.php/Special:Drilldown/bridge_data"