Drilldown: bridge data

17854 (1)

ST (1)

04-19 (1)

Brevard (1)

Melbourne (1)

00009 (1)

None (1)

Lake Washington Road (1)

None (1)

I-95 SB (1)

700043 (1)

I-95 SB -Lk Washington Rd (1)

28084584 (1)

80422180 (1)

FDOT (1)

1964 (1)

3 (1)

41250 (1)

2016 (1)

Highway (1)

Highway - Waterway (1)

Prestressed concrete (1)

Stringer/Multi-beam/Girder (1)

53 (1)

18 (1)

Satisfactory (1)

Good (1)

Good (1)

Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. · Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. · Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and brush restrict the channel. · Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. · Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. · Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. · Bridge closed because of channel failure. Corrective action may put back in light service. · N/A · No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. · Other · None

N/A (1)

01-17 (1)

1 - way (1)

2009 (1)

Concrete Cast-in-Place (1)

Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required to protect exposed foundations · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing by assessment, by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing by assessment, by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. · Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. · Bridge not over waterway. · Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. · Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event. Instructions contained in a plan of action have been implemented to reduce the risk to users from a bridge failure during or immediately after a flood event. · Other · None

71569 (1)

2038 (1)

None (1)