Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
bridge data > Place 004 :
Melbourne or
Tequesta village
& Channel 061:
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift.
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
700033 (1) ·
700043 (1) ·
700172 (1) ·
700186 (1) ·
704045 (1) ·
704188 (1) ·
705601 (1) ·
705603 (1) ·
705604 (1) ·
930056 (1)
'.5 Mi W of SR-507 ' (1) ·
'0.1 mi E of Wickham Road ' (1) ·
'0.2 Miles East of US-1 ' (1) ·
'0.3MI E OF US-1 (SR-5) ' (1) ·
'0.9 mi N of Wickham Rd ' (1) ·
'1.35Mi N of US-192 ' (1) ·
'100 ft West of Ruffner Rd' (1) ·
'Apollo Blvd - Eau Gallie ' (1) ·
'SR-507 over Crane Creek ' (1) ·
I-95 SB -Lk Washington Rd (1)
Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. (1) ·
N/A (1) ·
Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. (1) ·
Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1)
Showing below up to 10 results in range #1 to #10.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)