Drilldown: bridge data
From Indian River Lagoon Project
Choose a table:
- Event (169)
- News Link (111)
- Organization (18)
- Waterbody (27)
- bridge (13)
- bridge data (1468)
- definition (254)
- fips (487)
- repository (98)
- timeline (19)
- weblink (123)
Use the filters below to narrow your results.
'4TH STREET ' (1) ·
'CAMINO GARDENS BL ' (1) ·
'CAMINO GARDENS BLV' (1) ·
'CR-619 82ND AVE. ' (1) ·
'CR605 OLD DIXIE HW' (1) ·
'CYPRESS WAY ' (1) ·
'E. Minnesota Ave. ' (1) ·
'Girard Blvd. ' (1) ·
'Magnolia Avenue ' (1) ·
'SR-507 NB ' (1) ·
'SR91 SB TPK 189.1 ' (1) ·
'Taylor Road ' (1) ·
'TROON DR ' (1)
700185 (1) ·
704016 (1) ·
794009 (1) ·
794014 (1) ·
794015 (1) ·
880018 (1) ·
880019 (1) ·
880060 (1) ·
884022 (1) ·
935002 (1) ·
935204 (1) ·
935206 (1) ·
935207 (1) ·
940029 (1)
'0.1 mi W of Banana Rvr Dr' (1) ·
'0.1MI E of SW 9TH AVE ' (1) ·
'0.2 mi E of CR-415 ' (1) ·
'0.2 Mi East of US-1 ' (1) ·
'0.2 MILE E OF SW 9TH AVE ' (1) ·
'0.2MI S of CAMINO GARDEN ' (1) ·
'0.3 MILES NORTH OF US-1 ' (1) ·
'0.5Mi West of Kepler Rd. ' (1) ·
'0.7 MILE NORTH OF SR-60 ' (1) ·
'1.4 MI S OF OSCEOLA CNTY ' (1) ·
'150FT S OF N CNTRY CLBDR ' (1) ·
'1MI NORTH OF SR-60 ' (1) ·
'AT 74TH AVE. ' (1) ·
'SR-507 NB - Tillman Canal' (1)
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) ·
Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and brush restrict the channel. (1) ·
Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) ·
Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1)
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required to protect exposed foundations (1) ·
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) ·
Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. (1) ·
Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1)
Showing below up to 14 results in range #1 to #14.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)