Drilldown: bridge data

From Indian River Lagoon Project
bridge data > Status: AM & Service Under 042b: Waterway & Kind 043a: Prestressed concrete

Use the filters below to narrow your results.

ObjectID:
Status: (Click arrow to add another value)
Date:
03-03 (1) · 05-03 (1) · 12-02 (1)
County 003:
Brevard (1) · Indian River (1) · Martin (1) · Palm Beach (1) · Saint Lucie (1) · Volusia (1)
Place 004:
Route 005d:
Direction 005e:
None (1)
Features 006a:
Critical 006b:
None (1)
Facility 007:
Number 008:
Location 009:
Latitude 016:
Longitude 017:
Owner 022:
31 (1) · City (1) · County (1) · FDOT (1) · Town (1)
Built 027:
Lanes 028a:
1 (1) · 12 (1) · 2 (1) · 3 (1) · 4 (1) · 5 (1) · 6 (1) · 7 (1) · 8 (1) · 9 (1)
Traffic 029:
Traffic Year 030:
2013 (1) · 2014 (1) · 2015 (1) · 2016 (1) · 2017 (1)
Service On 042a:
Highway (1) · Highway - Pedestrian (1)
Service Under 042b: (Click arrow to add another value)
Kind 043a: (Click arrow to add another value)
Type 043b:
Channel beam (1) · Slab (1) · Stringer/Multi-beam/Girder (1) · Tee beam (1)
Length 049:
Width 052:
10 (1) · 11 (1) · 12 (1) · 13 (1) · 14 (1) · 15 (1) · 16 (1) · 17 (1) · 18 (1) · 20 (1) · 22 (1) · 23 (1) · 24 (1) · 25 (1) · 26 (1) · 28 (1) · 29 (1) · 30 (1) · 32 (1) · 33 (1) · 34 (1) · 35 (1) · 36 (1) · 38 (1) · 39 (1) · 40 (1) · 42 (1) · 43 (1) · 47 (1) · 62 (1) · 8 (1) · 84 (1) · 9 (1)
Deck 058:
Fair (1) · Good (1) · Satisfactory (1) · Very Good (1)
Superstructure 059:
Fair (1) · Good (1) · Satisfactory (1) · Serious (1) · Very Good (1)
Substructure 060:
Fair (1) · Good (1) · Imminent Failure (1) · Poor (1) · Satisfactory (1) · Very Good (1)
Channel 061:
Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. (1) · Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and brush restrict the channel. (1) · Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) · Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. (1) · Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. (1) · Bridge closed because of channel failure. Corrective action may put back in light service. (1) · No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. (1)
Culvert 062:
N/A (1)
Inspect Date 090:
01-17 (1) · 01-18 (1) · 02-16 (1) · 02-17 (1) · 03-16 (1) · 03-17 (1) · 04-16 (1) · 04-17 (1) · 05-16 (1) · 05-17 (1) · 06-16 (1) · 06-17 (1) · 07-16 (1) · 07-17 (1) · 08-16 (1) · 08-17 (1) · 09-16 (1) · 10-16 (1) · 10-17 (1) · 11-16 (1) · 11-17 (1) · 12-16 (1) · 12-17 (1)
Direction 102:
1 - way (1) · 2 - way (1) · 2 way (1) · One lane bridge for 2 way traffic (1)
Rebuilt 106:
None (1) · 1980 (1) · 1983 (1) · 1987 (1) · 1988 (1) · 1989 (1) · 1992 (1) · 1994 (1) · 1995 (1) · 1997 (1) · 2000 (1) · 2002 (1) · 2003 (1) · 2005 (1) · 2006 (1) · 2007 (1) · 2009 (1) · 2010 (1) · 2011 (1) · 2012 (1) · 2013 (1) · 2014 (1) · 2015 (1) · 2016 (1)
Deck Type 107:
9 (1) · Concrete Cast-in-Place (1) · Concrete Precast Panels (1) · N/A (1)
Scour 113:
Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles (Example B) by assessment (i.e.,bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge), by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be within the limits of footing or piles by assessment, by calculations or by installation of properly designed countermeasures. (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required to protect exposed foundations (1) · Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. Scour is determined to be above top of footing (Example A) by assessment (i.e., bridge foundations are on rock formations that have been determined to resist scour within the service life of the bridge4), by calculation or by installation of properly designed countermeasures (1) · Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable for assessed or calculated scour conditions: Scour within limits of footing or piles. Scour below spread-footing base or pile tips. (1) · Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Until risk can be determined, a plan of action should be developed and implemented to reduce the risk to users from abridge failure during and immediately after a flood event. (1) · Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event. Instructions contained in a plan of action have been implemented to reduce the risk to users from a bridge failure during or immediately after a flood event. (1)
Future 114:
Future Year 115:
2033 (1) · 2034 (1) · 2035 (1) · 2036 (1) · 2037 (1) · 2038 (1) · 2039 (1)
Clearance 116:
None (1)

Showing below up to 183 results in range #1 to #183.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

T


View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://indianriverlagoonnews.org/guide/index.php/Special:Drilldown/bridge_data"